A Comparison of Two Principal Systems for Monitoring of Technology-Induced Errors in Electronic Health Records
Current methods for monitoring harm caused by health information technology(HIT)are minimal,even if there are known risks associated with the use of HIT.Monitoring is predominantly based on voluntary reporting using generic patient safety adverse events reporting systems.Another important means for monitoring technology-induced errors is a health authority reporting system.International oversight systems have medical devices′ related softwares adverse event and failure reporting models,but these systems differ due to differencies in the legislation.The protocol for this study included an electronic database literature search and the eliciting of information for study purposes from the literature.The purpose is to provide a scoping review focused on two types of systems and provide implications for monitoring technologyinduced errors in the future.The analysis revealed not only differences,but also similarities between these systems which raises the question of these systems effectiviness due to overlapping goals in collecting data.
Electronic Health Records Patient Safety,Medical Informatics
Sari Palojoki Elizabeth M.Borycki Andre W.Kushniruk Kaija Saranto
University of Eastern Finland,Department of Health and Social Management,Finland School of Health Information Science,University of Victoria,Victoria,Canada
国际会议
第十六届世界医药健康信息学大会((MEDINFO2017)、第二届世界医药健康信息学华语论坛(WCHIS 2017)、第15届全国医药信息学大会(CMIA 2017)
苏州
英文
1108-1112
2017-08-21（万方平台首次上网日期，不代表论文的发表时间）