Environmental R&D with Permits Trading
This paper models the simultaneous investments in cost-reducing and environmental R&D by asymmetric firms competing a la Cournot. Pollution rights are allocated by the regulator, and firms can trade pollution permits. Both R&D competition and R&D cooperation are considered; in the latter case, firms fully share information about technologies. In a 3stage game, firms first invest in R&D, then trade permits, and then compete in output. The strategic interaction between different types of R&D investments is analyzed. It is found that the permit price depends on total permits only, not on their initial allocations. The optimal allocation of pollution rights by the social planner is also considered; the allocation of permits between firms matters for social welfare in the presence of environmental R&D under noncooperative R&D, but is irrelevant under cooperative R&D. Moreover, it is optimal to give firms less permits when spillovers are high. In addition, grandfathering permits (proportionally to prepermit output) is studied. Compared with social optimal allocation, grandfathering allocates too many permits to the large firm and too many permits to the small firm. Furthermore, an R&D budget constraint is introduced; when the constraint is binding, firms underinvest more in standard R&D than in environmental R&D.
Environmental R&D Permit Trading Pollution permits Cost-reducing R&D
Gamal Atallah Jianqiao Liu
Department of Economics, University of Ottawa, Canada Environment Canada, Canada
国际会议
太原
英文
15-30
2012-07-03（万方平台首次上网日期，不代表论文的发表时间）