The Comparison of Conventional Yaw Axis control Versus Closed Loop Yaw Axis Control
The primary flight control system (PFCS) provides full time and full authority three axis, dynamic control law functions (pitch, roll and yaw) and nondynamic control law functions (aileron droop, speed brake and ground lift dump). In addition, the PFCS calculates operational and limiting airspeed in order to provide full flight envelope protection across the entire flight envelope. PFCS provides limited gust alleviation function in the yaw axis. This paper provides a high level comparison of conventional Yaw Axis control (Pedal to Surface with Augmentation) versus Closed Loop Yaw Axis control. Pedal to Surface versus Closed Loop design options have implications on a variety of factors including Human Factors, Gust Response, structural limiting requirements, asymmetric thrust response, and rudder trim.
Conventional Yaw Axis Design Closed Loop Yaw Axis Design Gust Response Asymmetric thrust response Rudder Trim
Ju Kunru Zhang Renjie XuDanli
Information and Engineering Department of TV University Shanghai, China
国际会议
武汉
英文
138-141
2011-08-20(万方平台首次上网日期,不代表论文的发表时间)