COMPARATIVE STUDY OF GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIZATION OF U.S. ELECTRICAL ENERGY SOURCES
Perception that U.S. government energy subsidies have favored nuclear energy at expense of renewables (hydroelectric, wind, solar, geothermal) is not supported by facts. Largest beneficiaries between 1950 and 2006 from federal energy subsidies have been oil and gas receiving more than half of all federal incentives. Primary subsidy for nuclear energy has been R&D. Evaluating the actual electrical energy produced resulting from government subsidy support shows that wind and solar have cost taxpayers 355mils/kWh, coal 1.53 mils/kWh, nuclear 3.8 mils/kWh and hydro at 5.88 mils/kWh. Average cost of U.S. electrical energy in 2006 was 91 mils/kWh so renewables were subsidized at four times the average cost of electricity. Subsidy for Solar Photovoltaic to produce 0.01% of U.S. electricity as of 2006 was $4.43/kWh.
Gary M.Sandquist Jay F.Kunze
Applied Science Professionals, LLC P.O.Box 9052 Salt Lake City, UT 84109 Idaho State University Pocatello, ID 84109
国际会议
18th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering(第18届国际核能工程大会 ICONE 18)
西安
英文
1-7
2010-05-17（万方平台首次上网日期，不代表论文的发表时间）