会议专题

Evaluation of Scientific Researchers Academic Performance Based on Contribution Ratio

The contribution of authors are not differentiated in the tradition evaluation methods of scientific researchers academic performance, which not only leading to unfair and unscientific results, but also resulting in bad effects. Firstly, the shortcomings of tradition methods, such as counterpart evaluation, published articles and cited frequency, impact index, H index and so on, are reviewed because of undifferentiating contribution ratio. A new evaluation method of scientific researchers academic performance which is based on contribution ratio is brought forward in this paper. After that, the method is applied into the evaluation process of researchers in the civil aero-engine subject of China. The analysis results which are accurate and logic demonstrate the new method is applicable, logic and fair.

scientific researchers academic performance evaluation published articles cited frequency contribution ratio

Jianyu TANG Keping WANG Jing GUO

Archives Center of Shanghai Aircraft Design and Research Institute, Commercial Aircraft, Corporation Institute of Scientific & Technical Information, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, China Shanghai Jiao Tong University Library, Shanghai, China

国际会议

International Council for Scientific and Technical Information Annual Conference(国际科技信息委员会2011年夏季年会 ICSTI 2011)

北京

英文

237-240

2011-06-07(万方平台首次上网日期,不代表论文的发表时间)