Comparisons of isoefficiency analysis and numerical experiments about CRS and ICRS methods
In this paper, based the methods presented by Zhang et al. Conjugate residual square method and its improvement for nonsymmetric linear systems, Int. J. Comput. Math., accepted, 2009, we further study the performance of CRS and ICRS methods. However, we theoretically compare the isoefficiency analysis and make numerical experiments about CRS and ICRS methods which show that ICRS method has better parallelism and scalability than CRS method.
nonsymmetric linear systems ICRS method krylov subspace methods
Litao Zhang Shaohua Cheng
Department of Mathematics and Physics,Zhengzhou Institute of Aeronautical Industry Management,Zhengzhou, 450015, China
国际会议
南京
英文
558-562
2010-05-08(万方平台首次上网日期,不代表论文的发表时间)