A NEW HYBRID RELIABILITY ANALYSIS METHOD: THE DESIGN POINT - RESPONSE SURFACE - SIMULATION METHOD
Classical reliability methods such as First- and Second-Order Reliability Methods (FORM and SORM) have been important breakthroughs toward feasible and reliable integration of probabilistic information and uncertainty analysis into advanced design methods and modern design codes. These methods have been successfully used in solving challenging reliability problems. Nevertheless, caution should be used in the applications of these methods since their limitations and shortcomings in terms of applicability and accuracy are known and documented. Current research trends highlight the importance of structural reliability analysis methodologies that are able to provide improved estimates of the failure probability without excessive increase in computational cost when compared with ordinary FORM/SORM analyses. In this work, a new hybrid reliability analysis method, denoted as Design Point Response Surface Simulation (DP-RS-Sim) method is proposed and illustrated. This method innovatively combines the design point (DP) search used in FORM/SORM analyses with the response surface method and appropriate simulation techniques. The need for this combination has emerged from the results obtained through visualization of the limit state surfaces (LSSs) typically used in finite element reliability analysis. In particular, the visualization results show that these LSSs are often highly nonlinear in the neighborhood of their DPs. As application example, the time-invariant reliability analysis of a reinforced concrete frame structure subjected to horizontal pushover loads is considered. DP-RS-Sim-based estimations of the probability of limit state exceedance (expressed in terms of displacement thresholds) by the benchmark structure are compared with FORM, SORM, crude Monte Carlo and Importance Sampling results in terms of accuracy and computational cost. It is shown that the new DP-RS-Sim method can provide accurate failure probability estimates at low computational cost compared to other structural reliability methods.
Structural Reliability Limit State Surface Response Surface Method Monte Carlo Simulation Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis.
M. Barbato Q. Gu J.P. Conte
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State University,3531 Patrick F. Taylor H Engineer, AMEC Geomatrix Consultants Inc. 510 Superior Ave., Suit 200, Newport Beach, CA, 92663, USA Department of Structural Engineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive,La Joll
国际会议
14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering(第十四届国际地震工程会议)
北京
英文
2008-10-12（万方平台首次上网日期，不代表论文的发表时间）