Comparison of the Seismic Response of Steel Buildings Incorporating Self-Centering Energy Dissipative Braces, Buckling Restrained Braced and Moment Resisting Frames
The seismic response of special moment-resisting frames (SMRF), buckling restrained braced (BRB) frames and self-centering energy dissipating (SCED) braced frames is compared when used in building structures of 2 to 12 stories in height. The study involves pushover analysis as well as 2D and 3D nonlinear time history analysis for two ground motion hazard levels. The SCED and BRB braced frames generally experienced similar peak interstory drifts. The SMRF system had larger interstory drifts than both braced frames, especially for the shortest structures. The SCED system exhibited a more uniform distribution of the drift demand along the building height and was less prone to the biasing of the response in one direction due to P-Delta effects. The SCED braced frames also had significantly smaller residual lateral deformations. The two braced frame systems experienced similar interstory drift demand when used in torsional irregular structures.
Bracing member Residual drifts Self-centering Torsion Yielding
H. Choi J. Erochko C. Christopoulos R. Tremblay
Post-Doctoral Fellow, Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Korea Ph.D. Candidate Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering,University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada Professor, Dept. of Civil, Geological and Mining Engineering, école Polytechnique, Montréal, Canada
国际会议
14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering(第十四届国际地震工程会议)
北京
英文
2008-10-12（万方平台首次上网日期，不代表论文的发表时间）