Failure of Asset Pricing Models: Transaction Cost, Irrationality, or Missing Factors
The reason for the failure of asset pricing models can be divided into several: Transaction costs, investors irrationality, or missing risk factors. The objective of this paper is to find which of these candidates is the most important reason for the failure. To accomplish this object, we investigate the relation between explanatory power of various asset pricing models and variables related to the failure of asset pricing models. First, we find that both transaction costs and investors irrationality have statistically significant relation with the difference of realized return from expected return reported by the CAPM even after size and book-to-market are included in the Fama-Macbeth regression. Second, we implement the same testing procedure of the CAPM to the Fama and French three factor model and the Carhart four factor model. The results of regressions are all similar to the CAPMs. If a missing risk factor is the main reason for the failure of the CAPM, and the three factor model at least improves the CAPM, we should observe a different pattern of regression coefficients. However, all Wald statistics cannot reject the null hypothesis that the regression coefficients of asset pricing models are the same. Therefore, we argue that poor performance of the asset pricing models is resulted from both transaction costs and investors irrationality, rather than missing factors.
Asset pricing Model Transaction cost Investors irrationality Missing risk factor Fama and Macbeth (1973) regression
Joon Chae Cheol-Won Yang
Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
国际会议
成都
英文
2007-07-09（万方平台首次上网日期，不代表论文的发表时间）