On the Paradox of LF or SEM
In GB, the overt wh-movement at S-structure as in (1) is licensed and isomorphically rendered into the LF representation in (2): (1) what does John think Mary wrote t? (2) Which x, x=THING such that John think(s) Mary wrote x. The reason why the S-representation of (1) should be rendered into the LF representation of (2) lies in the establishment of LF representation as an independent level of representation at the interface as argued in May (1976) and Huang (1982). Accordingly, an abstract movement of the shenme (what) in-situ in a language without overt wh-movement like Chinese is implemented from the S-structure in (3) to the LF representation in (4): (3) Yuehan renwei Mali xie-le shenme?
Ning Chunyan
Tianjin Normal University
国内会议
光盘
英文
19
2011-12-10(万方平台首次上网日期,不代表论文的发表时间)